The Clintons and Israel First: Jackals killing the republic, courting widespread civil unrest

The presidential campaign of 2016 has so far been a humdinger. With all of the republic’s most dangerous enemies gathered under the leadership of the Clintons, the race has become a kind of life-and-death match. A Trump win would see him and Governor Pence initiate America’s long road back to prosperity, nationalism, commonsense, social cohesiveness, and a war-avoiding foreign policy. A Clinton win, on the other hand, would force the issue of how dissenting Americans will choose to dispose, with some finality, of what surely will be Hillary’s continuing implementation of tyranny. The building blocks for more tyranny would be Clinton’s naming of Supreme Court justices to codify more legal preference for her party’s various slave colonies; her starting and losing of more unnecessary and bankrupting interventionist wars; her maintenance of  a coddled, bribed, and controlled media; her imposition of punitive taxes on working Americans and their employers to support foreigners, migrants, illegal aliens, the Democrats’ slave colonies, as well as to eliminate middle-class jobs via trade deals and the fabricated climate-change crisis; and her party’s final destruction of the Constitution, the idea of equality before the law, the middle class, the primacy of the English language, American history, and the Christianity that always has been and still is a key part of the republic’s social fabric.

In some ways this reality prompts memories of the period between Lincoln’s election in November, 1860, and his inauguration in March, 1861, which historians have termed the “Secession Winter”. Throughout those months, Lincoln publicly argued that the southern states had not been attacked by the national government, and that he had no intention of doing so or of trying to deny the region any of its rights under the Constitution, including the right to own slaves. The southerners nonetheless rebelled and declared themselves an independent state. They acted not because of the existing ominous, though not lethally threatening political environment, but on their fear of what Lincoln, the Republicans, and the abolitionists might do to their liberties and property as 1861 unfolded. They chose to start a civil war — or a war of independence, if you like — and not to wait for a physical or legal attack of some kind by the Lincoln administration. That probably was a poor decision by southern leaders, but it is understandable, perhaps even defensible. Reality, after all, is often based as much on perception as fact, and the southerners’ almost unanimous perception was that Lincoln and his administration directly threatened their liberty and property and so made it time for them to leave the Union.

No such problem will face Americans if Hillary Clinton is elected in November, 2016. If Clinton is elected, Americans who are opposed to her, her party of criminals, thugs, racists, and theorists, and, most important, to tyranny, will not have to wonder, worry, or fret about what she and her administration might do to destroy their history, jobs, wealth, traditions, liberty, Constitution, and religion. Nor will they have to wonder if tens of millions more unborn Americans will be murdered and dismembered for profit, or if tens of thousands more of the republic’s soldier-children will be killed and maimed in unnecessary, Israel-and-NATO-protecting  wars. All of these things, Americans will know with a terrible certainty, will be givens.

If Clinton wins, the republic, this time around, will face a much shorter “Secession Winter”, with inauguration day in January rather than March. But even that shorter interregnum is not a problem. Americans will know what is coming from a Clinton administration, and unlike our southern brethren 150 years ago, they will not have to make a decision based on fears about what might to happen to them and their property and liberties. They will know, without any reason for doubt, what is going to happen. The election of Mrs. Clinton means the end of the republic, perhaps not immediately, but soon and conclusively. But, all thanks to God, Americans will be able to deal with that reality on the basis of hard fact and not only fears and assumptions. At that time the die will be cast, and Americans may well confront a reason for rebellion that will require them to execute the duty they were assigned in the Declaration of Independence.  “Prudence, indeed,” the Continental Congress wrote as a committee-of-the whole,

will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

So the republic is headed for momentous and perhaps tragic and bloody times. Things may still work out without a repeat of 1861 and all that came in its train. Let us all work and vote for that end, and pray with utmost sincerity all goes well. In the meantime, the following items are worth considering. They are crystal clear auguries of what a Hillary Clinton administration will bring; namely, more lies, corruption, criminality, war, foreign influence and masters, bankruptcy, arrogance, debt, and unconstitutional national-government diktats for what were once the free and independent American republic and people.

–A Tale of Heroic Feminism:  That increasingly feeble icon of modern, self-reliant, liberated, and independent womanhood, Hillary Clinton, bellied up to the bar at the FBI and stoutly defended herself by telling Comey’s boys, “Colin made me do it.” Yes, Hillary and her aides betrayed their oaths of office, broke espionage and perjury laws, and treated their countrymen and their republic as expendable because of the Machiavellian advice of – a MAN.  Mrs. Clinton — posing as innocent little Hillary of Sunnybrook Farm —  wants all of us to believe that she resorted to criminality only because of former Secretary of State Colin Powell, who, she said, used a similar e-mail system during his tenure. General Powell’s office quickly released a polite memo claiming that Powell could not recall offering her the guidance she described, but he had sent her an e-mail memo saying he had used an AOL account for non-classified e-mails because the State Department did not have an unclassified e-mail system when he served there, a situation rectified long before Clinton was appointed to the office. General Powell’s office has since expressed some anger that Mrs. Clinton is trying to “pin” her criminality on the General. Nice try, Mrs. Clinton, but the sum of this story is that you lied again and you were called on it by the highly respected General Powell. You probably thought that General Powell would meekly allow his reputation for honor and honesty to be shredded by your lie because of all fine things that you and your party have done for Black people in America. Well, Mrs. C., the good general would not take the fall for you, and he may well be thinking along the lines of Mr. Trump’s question, “What the hell have Blacks got to lose by trying something new?” After all General Powell’s career was based on hard, republic-defending, and life-risking work, and it flourished during the tenure of the very Republicans that you, Mrs. C., and your fellow Simon Legree-like Democratic overseers deem racists. And by the way, Mrs. Clinton, was it not your husband who said of Barack Obama, “he’s the kind of guy we send to get our coffee”? It must be hoped that ol’ Marse Billy sees that General Powell is a decent, brave, and patriotic man and decides that he is at least worthy of stepping out and fetching bagels, maybe even croissants.

–Contribute now or forever hold your bribe: That felonious couple, Hillary and Bill Clinton, have announced that the Clinton Foundation will no longer accept foreign donations if Hillary is elected president. This is precisely like the national government saying that it will prohibit the sale of beer on 15 September 2016, and no American should dare to buy beer in the run-up to that date. In the latter case, beer would be flying off the shelves and stockpiled. Just so in the case of the Clintons. The Clinton Foundation’s decision to abandon part of its criminal enterprise if Mrs. C. becomes president is simply a message that says, “Hey foreigners! You better hurry up and buy our influence before election day – and, yes, the price has gone up — because if Mrs. C. wins, we are only going to betray America for those of you who have fully paid up before the inauguration.” Rather than a patriotic decision to stop doing the bidding of foreign donors at the expense of America’s national interests, the Clinton Foundation has just decided to launch a slick, intense, and short-duration campaign for massive illegal donations from foreigners, which it will collect at the syndicate’s big meeting in New York City in September 2016. The banner over that meeting’s dais will simply say “Bribe us Now, We Will Play for You Later!”

–Israel First is the Republicans’ and the republic’s cancer, Part 1: From the point in the Republican presidential primaries that Donald Trump first showed potential strength, the party’s Neoconservatives and Israel-Firsters have been the core and probably the funders of the never-Trump movement. That group includes Bill Kristol and his crew of fifth columnists, barely disguised as journalists, at the Weekly Standard; the similarly oriented fifth-column staffs at Commentary and National Review; Israel-First buffoons like Michael Bloomberg and Mark Levin; and FOX’s seemingly endless crew of Israel-First shills, Kristol, again, George Will, Charles Krauthammer, the hosts of “The Five”, easily history’s all-time worst television news program, and the network’s team of always wrong on war, but always pro-Israel retired U.S. general officers. Will and Krauthammer are in a class of their own. Each drips personal hatred for Trump; indeed, Will seems half-or-more crazed when dispensing his anti-Trump venom, and not infrequently Brett Baier, host of the fine Special Report program, has had to correct or inject himself into one of Will’s anti-Trump tirades to maintain a bare semblance of “fair and balanced.” This past week, however, it was Krauthammer’s turn to show the ever-bright, always dastardly trademark of Israel First; namely, that U.S. interests can go to either hell or war if that will stop Trump. Mr. Baier’s panel was discussing Mrs. Clinton’s lengthy list of foreign-policy liabilities, when Krauthammer gleefully noted that Trump would be in political trouble if “his friend” Putin invaded Ukraine. Clearly, Krauthammer did not care if the United States became involved in a war with Russia that would have to go nuclear because the rest of NATO has unilaterally disarmed since the fall of the USSR. No, Krauthammer, Kristol, and the rest of the disloyal Jewish-American fifth columnists are willing to run that risk – or any risk – if it would help to get the completely AIPAC- and Israel First-owned Mrs. Clinton elected president.

–Israel First is the Republicans’ and the republic’s cancer, Part 2:  On 10 August 2016, CNN published a list of twelve U.S. Senators and Congressmen who are not supporting Donald Trump.(1) Having seen Israel-First’s deranged and vicious hatred of Mr. Trump, I thought it might be interesting to see if the anti-Trump Republican members of Congress found on the CNN list are tied to Israel First and have been bidden by their fifth-column masters to oppose Trump, even though it might mean sinking their party, countrymen, and republic by helping to elect a perjurer, influence-peddler, and authoritarian like Hillary Clinton. What I found about the anti-Trumpers, after doing just a small bit of research, follows and speaks for itself. All of the dozen on CNN’s list are recipients of pro-Israel funding — although several sold themselves pretty cheaply – and some also have received one or more free trips to Israel. In essence, Israel First’s leaders said “jump” to the dozen Republican members of the U.S. Congress listed by CNN and those lickspittles eagerly replied “Sure, how high?” while tugging their forelocks.

–Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $112, 310 (2)

–Senator Ben Sasse (R-Nebraska): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $286,350

–Senator Mark Kirk (R-Illinois):  Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $718,246

–Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $100,354

–Senator Jeff Flake (R-Arizona): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $119,350

–Senator Dean Heller (R-Nevada): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $71,100

–Congressman Scott Rigell (R-Virginia): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $2,000

–Congressman Adam Kinzinger (R-Illinois): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $22,150

–Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen: Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $67,650, and four free trips to Israel valued at $66,794 (3)

–Congressman Charlie Dent (R-Pennsylvania): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $5,750 and one free trip to Israel valued at $17,112

–Congressman Mike Coffman (R-Colorado): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $11,400, and one free trip to Israel valued at $14,624

–Congressman Bob Dold (R-Illinois): Contributions from pro-Israel groups – $118,320, and one free trip to Israel valued at $11,119

 

Endnotes:

–1.) http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/10/politics/donald-trump-republican-opposition/

–2.) http://maplight.org/us-congress/interest/J5100/view/all. This website provided the contribution totals for each candidate named by CNN. The total for each senator, per the website, covers contributions for the last six years of available data, Apr 1, 2009 – Mar 31, 2015, including contributions to presidential campaigns. The totals for each member of the House of Representatives, per the website, covers contributions for the last two years of available data, Apr 1, 2013 – Mar 31, 2015, including contributions to presidential campaigns.

–3.) https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2011/09/18/the-list-of-congressional-representatives-who-took-trips-to-israel-do-they-represent-you-or-israel/. This site provided the data for the free-trips to Israel taken by four of the Representatives noted above. The data is from 2011, and the four may or may not have taken more free trips to Israel by now.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

For God’s sake, Mr, Trump, man-up and stop playing the game of America’s internal foes

Mr. Trump, you have fallen into a snare placed for you by the Republican establishment people on your team, most of the media, and by Hillary Clinton and her advisers.

The name of that trap is “complexity” and it is used by both party establishments to explain why they never solve any of the problems America faces. Oh, they promise to do so, but when they fail – and they always fail – they say it is because the problem is too “complex”, too “multifaceted, or too “nuanced”, and that it needs great amounts of time and enormous sums of money to solve. [NB: Like the “generational war” against Islam lusted for by those 50 Israel-First war-mongers who wrote you the public letter.]

Mr. Trump, THIS IS REPUBLIC KILLING BULLSHIT!!!

Clear, commonsense, patriotic, and non-complex ideas brought you to the dance and won you the nomination, do not throw that success away by the playing the bipartisan enemy’s confuse-bilk-and-deceive-the-voters game called “complexity”.

Try the following:

Organizing Principle: AMERICA FIRST

Components of the Principle:

–Debt and War: America is broke and its military is broken, no more wars unless attacked.

–ISIS: This is an American problem only if we are attacked at home; otherwise, let the Islamists’ real enemies fight and win or lose on their own, while we belatedly act to defend North America.

–Student Debt: Kill all of the national government’s student loan programs and force the universities to compete, as well as to decide if they want to lower their extortionate, debt-creating tuition, and greatly improve and depoliticize their product, or want a mass of permanently empty lecture halls.

–Guns: Uncompromising defense of the 2nd Amendment, and talk about the legal and constitutional option it gives all Americans to — as a last resort — offer armed resistance to the tyranny being imposed on the republic by both party establishments, the media, and the academy.

–Immigration: (a) Build the wall; (b) enforce the law and deport all illegals; and (c) ban all immigration for 5 or 10 years so there is no supportable claim that one group is being discriminated against.

–Taxes: Repeat, repeat, and repeat, “Only lower taxes for all can pave the road to cutting the debt, creating jobs, and rebuilding the middle class and military.”

–Black Americans: Do not “reach out” to Black Americans, both party establishments want you to look like a fool and fail. Most Blacks have voted like mindless slaves for 50 years and are likely to keep doing so for the foreseeable future. Those who want to de-slave and attain dignity and jobs will have to make that decision for themselves and act accordingly.

–Law-and-order: Back the police full-up so long as their actions are lawful, and offer no “sympathy” or “understanding” for thugs, assassins, and looters who are “discouraged”, “frustrated”, “unemployed”, and “without hope”. The party they slavishly vote for has made and kept them that way for 50 years. They apparently like it.

 –Trade: (a) No multi-country deals, only bilateral; (a) no multi-country, trade-regulating organizations that negate U.S. sovereignty; and (c) only trade deals that increase blue-collar jobs.

–Foreign financial and military aid: None

–Allies: (a) As few as possible, none permanent; (b) none that can get us into their wars automatically; and (c) withdraw from NATO.

As the good people of Buffalo would say, Mr. Trump, you can win, but only “if ya dance wit da guys dat brung ya.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

A coming headline? “American elites perish in lethal storm they deliberately brewed”

 If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers, may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual state. Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist Papers, No. 28 (1)

 

Something near despair about the republic’s future is about the only reaction one can have when reading the media’s fatuous coverage of Trump’s words about the 2nd Amendment. Sharpening that reaction, of course, is the media’s simultaneous and knowing failure to note that, in 2008, Hillary Clinton said she would not drop out of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, although far behind, because Obama might be “assassinated”. Coming from the co-leader of the Clinton political machine, which generally terminates with extreme malice those it no longer needs or deems obstacles to what it wants [NB: Most recently in Washington, DC?], Mrs. Clinton words were clearly as much incitement as comment, perhaps more. [NB: Did the Secret Service talked to her about what she said?] Currently, of course, she and her party are four-square behind their newest slave colony, the one composed of the lethally violent thugs, racists, and assassins who form the membership of Black Lives Matter.

Repeatedly in this space, I have suggested that Americans need to recall what the 2nd Amendment was and is intended to do. Yes, it assures Americans have the right and ability to defend themselves, their families, and their homes, as well as to hunt for various kinds of animals. But there is much more to it.

The other, much greater, and absolutely vital intent of the 2nd Amendment is to make sure that Americans – as a last resort – have the ability to act collectively to secure their freedom and liberties against other Americans who win public office and then fail to abide by the Constitution and/or refuse to execute laws that are already on the books. In short, the 2nd Amendment ensures that Americans perpetually have the option to choose between (a) submitting themselves like cattle, sheep, and goats to the whims of tyrants and their unconstitutional rule and (b) refusing to abide by a tyrant’s dictates and making an armed effort to subdue their tormentors. The 2nd Amendment, quite simply, is designed to allow Americans to faithfully abide by the instructions laid down in the form of a duty in the Declaration of Independence; namely, to rebel against and drive out or, if necessary, kill politicians who behave as tyrants.

And in this context it is worth saying that the Founders did not intend the 2nd Amendment to provide a right to “assassination”. In their day and ours the killing of one would-be tyrant would do little but give like-minded others the opportunity to try to become a tyrant. No, assassination is a means of exacting revenge or imposing discipline, and is most usually carried out by organized criminal groups, political gangs, or by individuals with a personal grudge against a specific person. In America today, moreover, an assassination would change nothing as the number of would-be tyrants who inhabit both political parties, along with their liberty-sapping corps of advisers, funders, academic shills, and media acolytes, are far too numerous. No, to effectively restore our republic to liberty could well require nothing less than a collective, armed, and wide-ranging American rebellion of the kind the Founders, God’s peace be upon them, presided over and risked their own lives in fighting.

The most basic reason, then, that an accurate understanding of the 2nd Amendment must be known by voters and taught to our children is the reality that the peaceful means of getting rid of would-be tyrants and restoring liberty are no longer working. The Founders spent a great deal of time in the sultry summer of 1787 crafting the constitutional means for removing presidents and other government officials – by impeachment and subsequent trial — for either their criminal activities or their deliberate violations of the U.S. Constitution. If that constitutional provision was still relevant, each of the last four presidents would have been quite easily impeached for starting wars without the congressional declaration of war the Constitution mandates, and for routinely, deliberately, and often boastfully violating their oaths of office by refusing to promptly execute and enforce the law.

Obama, of course, is the worst of this lot and should have been impeached for (a) using the IRS to persecute conservative organizations; (b) rewriting congressional legislation to meet his political needs; (c) refusing to arrest and hold/deport those foreigners who automatically become felons by crossing the border illegally; (d) releasing prisoners-of-war he knows will return to the battlefield to kill U.S. Marines and soldiers; (e) allowing the Department of Justice to block an investigation of the racketeering Clinton Foundation; (f) allowing groups of terrorist-seeded refugees into America without the rigorous vetting required by law; (g) starting unconstitutional wars; and (h) refusing to enforce laws passed by Congress. On the basis of Obama’s irrefutably tyrant-like performance, the Founders would, I think, be amazed that the people’s elected representatives did not employ the Constitution’s impeachment process against such a removal-meriting man. And perhaps they also might have been surprised, and even a bit dismayed, that the citizenry did not show signs of bringing the true intent of the 2nd Amendment into play on this issue.

Without the anti-tyranny safeguard of the impeachment process – now paralyzed by presidential criminality, congressional cowardice, the tyranny-loving media, incompetent and lying academics, and too much citizen inattention and apathy – the means for resisting tyranny in America are few. In addition to impeachment, for example, the ballot box also seems to no longer work as a means of halting the growth of tyranny, given the many unconstitutional acts of the last four presidents, and the Obama administration’s refusal to indict Hillary Clinton for perjury, aiding and abetting the country’s enemies, and using the office of Secretary of State for personal gain, thereby letting a woman who should be in jail run for the presidency. And in this age of computer voting and hacking, who, in their right mind, is gullible enough to believe that national elections are not rigged in one way or another by either the two power-mad political parties or outsiders.

There also is zero protection in the glib claim of politicians that Americans need not worry about their right to bear arms being abrogated because the Constitution cannot be changed save by using the amendment procedure it requires. Note Obama’s arrogant, clearly unconstitutional, and clearly unchallenged conduct, and recall that half  of the 2nd Amendment already has been negated without amendment. Can anyone locate the amendment that ended the 2nd Amendment’s guarantee of state militias, which were meant to be the bulwark of state security and sovereignty, and were to be controlled by the states unless the nation became involved in a constitutional war? That part of the 2nd Amendment was negated by legislation, not by the amendment process required by the Constitution, and it has left the states no military force with which to prevent the national government from doing as it pleases, and that is precisely what the national government intended.

In this event, history, as always, was repeating itself. Virginia’s great, lawyer, politician, and statesman George Mason — who refused to sign the Constitution at Philadelphia because it had no bill of rights — told the 1788 Virginia ratifying convention that the one of first steps tyrants would take to disarm the people as a whole would be to neutralize their militia organizations.

“Forty years ago, when the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually, by totally disusing and neglecting the militia.” (2)

So with state militias already illegally destroyed, it becomes more important with each passing year to impress upon Americans and their children the sanctity of the still viable section of the 2nd Amendment, an accurate and sober understanding of its intent, and their responsibilities under it. As noted, the Founders intended the impeachment process to be a readily usable tool with which to remove criminals or tyrants from office, one that would leave resort to the 2nd Amendment infrequent, the very existence of which would warn would-be-tyrants that not only their offices and reputations, but also their lives are ultimately in the hands of the same kind of people who won the republic’s independence from Britain, ones whom the historian John Shy described as “A people numerous and armed.” (3)

With the multiple firewalls the Founders built into the Constitution to make the 2nd Amendment a last resort already discarded or quickly disappearing, the use of the 2nd Amendment’s right to rebellion is emerging as the citizenry’s only constitutional option, no longer its constitutional tool of last resort. If that option is ever used, ironically, the elites will suffer most from the bloody brunt of the constitutional storm they knowingly caused by their arrogance, condescension, greed, and corruption, and perhaps most of all by their failure to heed mama’s sage advice that it is very dangerous to play with guns.

 

Endnotes:

–1.) http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed28.asp

–2.) http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/articles/rewriting.html

–3.) John Shy. A People Numerous and Armed. Reflections on the Military Struggle for American Independence. (Revised Edition). Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Papperbacks, 1990.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Mr. Trump: You have scared and pissed-off the war lovers. Well done, keep at it.

The bipartisan governing elite’s panic over Mr. Trump’s potential for destroying their cozy, elitist, bribe-filled, war-causing, and increasingly authoritarian culture is quite clear in the self-righteous, all-knowing, and citizenry-hating anti-Trump letter published on 8 August 2016. It was signed by 50 Republicans who identify themselves as foreign-policy experts, which in both parties is code for “arrogant and war-loving interventionists”.

The signatories are not really Republican foreign-policy experts. They are rather bipartisan interventionists who are part of the continuum of the post-Soviet foreign-and-defense policy elite that has never, even for a second, considered applying the Founders’ commonsense, non-interventionist, strategically sound, and republic-preserving concept of “America First” to the conduct of the republic’s international affairs. They hate Mr. Trump for suggesting it because it would work and turn them out on the street.

Indeed, until Trump’s candidacy, the bipartisan interventionist elite never gave a damn which party governed because both parties allowed them to seek, cause, and revel in endless, usually unnecessary, and always lost wars; to be more loyal to the security interests of Israel, Arab tyrants, and their own wallets than to U.S. security interests; and to show not a single qualm about getting tens of thousands of America’s soldier-children killed or maimed in interventionist wars that do not need fighting and which they did not intend to win.

They also never gave a damn about what U.S. voters thought about and wanted in the nation’s foreign policy. All they really needed from U.S. citizens was (a) more of their income in taxes to spend profligately — mountains of which they gave to their foreign favorites — and (b) the lives and limbs of their non-Ivy-League-educated, and so expendable, children to waste in unnecessary wars.

Overall, Mr. Trump ought to wear the letter as a badge of honor. He also ought to keep drawing steady attention to the fact that the letter — notwithstanding its unconvincing weasel words to the contrary — fully endorse a Hillary Clinton presidency because she is, after all, one of them, an arrogant, war-loving, Israel-First interventionist.

As you read the letter, consider the following 25 items. They offer a glittering, if often blood-soaked array of the gifts that the bipartisan foreign-policy professionals/experts have given the American people over the past quarter century. You might ask yourself if you want more of such gifts for you, your family, your community, and our now weakening and endangered republic.

The interventionists have given their fellow citizens:

–1.) The war-causing insanity found in the concept of “American exceptionalism”, which the Founders would have rejected as not only ahistorical, but as evidence of war lust, and arrogance bordering on hubris. Men of humility, the Founders believed Americans were human, no more and no less. They concluded that the only thing exceptional about Americans was the exceptional opportunity afforded them by living in an extraordinarily fertile, resource-and-water rich North America, a continent which also is reliably protected by the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and so allows Americans to mind their own business and avoid other peoples’ wars.

–2.) Advocacy for the unnecessary, unobtainable, interventionist, and war-causing “New World Order” of G.H.W. Bush.

–3.) An unnecessary war with Islam that will be 20 years old on 11 August 2016, which is now growing into a world war that the United States clearly is losing.

–4.) The failure to kill Osama bin Laden in 1998-1999 and thereby prevent the current and intensifying war with Islam.

–5.) A consistent support for Arab tyrannies that has earned Americans eternal hatred among Muslims.

–6.) The unnecessary 1992 U.S. intervention in Somalia and the consequent U.S. defeat and retreat from that country.

–7.) Multiple interventionist wars to install freedom and democracy in places like Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Somalia. The wars have not only failed to install democracy in those countries, but have provided the U.S. national government — under both parties — with the immediately grasped and exercised opportunity to increase the executive’s power and use it at home to constrict civil liberties guaranteed Americans by the Constitution.

–8.) All-out support for the Ethiopian invasion of Somalia in July, 2006, from which Ethiopian forces eventually retreated in defeat, but only after giving birth to Al-Shabaab.

–9.) Refusal to destroy al-Qaeda after the East Africa embassy bombings (1998) and the near-sinking of the USS Cole (2000).

–10.) Rules of engagement for soldiers and Marines in multiple wars that make them targets, not killers, and prevent U.S. victory.

–11.) A complete refusal to see the unbreakable ties between foreign and domestic affairs, which is most notable in their willingness to wage frequent, unnecessary, and always lost wars that have helped bankrupt America, divide its society, and make it hated around the world.

–12.) A consistent war-causing and Islamist-motivating willingness to always put Israel’s interests above genuine U.S. national security interests.

–13.) A necessary post-9/11 war in Afghanistan that started in October, 2001, and quickly became a democracy crusade which brought zero democracy to Afghanistan and the defeat of the U.S. military and its NATO allies.

–14.) An unnecessary war in Iraq that began in March, 2003, became a democracy crusade/war that the U.S.-led coalition lost, gave birth to ISIS, and turned the country into an oppressive and Iran-manipulated Shia theocracy.

–15.) The currently ongoing, unnecessary 2014 re-intervention in the already lost Iraq war.

–16.) The currently ongoing, unnecessary, and now escalating re-intervention in the already lost war in Afghanistan.

–17.) With the EU, support for the overthrow of the pro-Russian regime in Ukraine, an action that necessitated Russia’s re-annexation of Crimea and, with that event, restarted the Cold War.

–18.) The exhaustion, in multiple unnecessary and lost wars, of the U.S. military in human and material terms. And, because of the threat-filled world the bipartisan interventionists have created, the guaranteeing of  steep increases in defense spending, funded by either more taxes, more debt, or both, and the near-certain resumption of conscription.

–19.) Foreign policies in the Muslim world that since 9/11 have yielded U.S. military casualties of c. 6,650 killed and c. 42,000 wounded or maimed in lost wars, and have left the 2,996 people killed and the 6,000-plus wounded in the 9/11 attacks unavenged and now largely forgotten, save for one day a year.

–20.) No hint of concern about the Veterans Administration’s failures while the bipartisan interventionist signatories were guiding U.S. military and foreign affairs.

–21.) The shredding of the Fourth Amendment’s protections via NSA’s collection of all U.S. citizens’ electronic communications.

–22.) An utter failure to insist that U.S. borders be controlled as an indispensable component of national defense, thereby awarding the republic’s foes free entry and safe haven until ordered to attack.

–23.) Supporting such mad war aims as giving democracy, freedom, liberty, women’s rights, and secularism to foreigners, in essence getting U.S. Marines killed so Mrs. Ibrahim can vote.

–24.) Treaties — especially the NATO Treaty — that negate America’s sovereignty by removing the republic’s ability to decide for itself when and for what it will go war or abstain therefrom.

–25.) Unnecessary wars and interventions in the Islamic world that have ensured that the territory of the United States will increasingly become a battlefield, one that may well create conditions that kill the republic and yield a military-backed tyranny in its place.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

And now the FBI Director argues for more tyranny

The past week added a bit of clarity to the citizenry’s ability to understand the lawless forces that have backed Obama and now back Hillary Clinton, as well as more evidence – if more was needed – that Clinton, if elected, will regard herself as another Obama-like, ruler-by-diktat. Clinton told the media that she would start by giving amnesty to 12 million illegal aliens — a number, thanks to Obama and Clinton, that now includes murderous Islamists — thereby ignoring both the law and the fact that most Americans have made it clear that they do not want 12 million more non-English-speaking, largely uneducated, and mostly bound-for-welfare foreigners sticking their hands into working Americans’ pockets and taking money from them and their families.

The bottom line increasingly seems to be that the people who support Clinton are either mindless fools or flagrant authoritarians, while she herself is an archetypical American gangster – like Al Capone, Dutch Schultz, Machine Gun Kelly, and her husband — specializing in graft, influence peddling, extortion, disposing with extreme malice those in her inner circle that she and Bill no longer need, and murdering and dismembering infants unable to defend themselves. Proving their superiority qualities when compared to the Clintons and their supporters, Capone, Schultz, and Kelly at least had the courage to murder people who could and would shoot back at them, or who had associates who would try to avenge them.

On Friday, then, FBI Director James Comey waded further into this ever-deepening cesspool of lawlessness by calling for a “national talk over encryption vs. safety”. Now, in a more normal and fair-minded time – say about 40 years ago – Americans would have rightly given Comey’s suggestion serious consideration because the ease with which Islamist fighters can encrypt messages certainly does pose a demonstrable threat to U.S. national security.

But not today. In recent months, Comey has proven himself to be just one more shill for a bipartisan political elite that promotes authoritarianism and its own lawlessness, and so tyranny, in America. Comey is now eager to further alter the 4th Amendment in ways that can only erode individual liberty and empower tyrants, but he refuses to recommend the much-merited indictment of Hillary Clinton — a foe of America much more lethal than ISIS — under both the espionage and perjury statutes. By failing to do so, this FBI Director has said more clearly than any other U.S. government official – elected or appointed – that the members of the bipartisan governing elite are beings superior to all other Americans, and so immune from all the laws that apply only to non-elite Americans.

Contrary to what Comey said, there is nothing difficult about indicting, prosecuting, and convicting Mrs. Clinton. She is the only American traitor that I can recall who has publicly convicted herself out of her own mouth –  saying, in essence, “I used a private, unsecured server to conduct the nation’s diplomacy for my own convenience” – and then lied, joked, and bragged about in public. In reality, the U.S. government has successfully prosecuted and imprisoned, or fired and revoked the security clearances of, many dozens of other men and women for the same kind of conduct, although surely not on the gargantuan scale of Clinton’s criminal behavior. But what can be expected from a coward like Comey, a supposedly tough prosecutor who does not even possess enough manliness to publicly refute and correct Hillary Clinton when she publicly lies about what he told the Congress about her obvious-to-all perjury and guilt?

Comey’s decision on Clinton also flushed out the extreme lawlessness at the top level of the U.S. intelligence community when General Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, refused to permanently revoke Hillary Clinton’s clearances, as well as those of all her senior assistants, and those of the president, cabinet members, and generals who knowingly used the communications system Clinton deliberately hid and left unsecured. Clapper and Michael Morrell, then CIA chief, also supported – and perhaps wrote — Hillary Clinton’s lies about the “democracy-bringing” Arab Spring, the defeat of al-Qaeda, the invasion of Libya, and the Islamists’ attack on Americans in Benghazi. Clapper’s treason-assisting dereliction of duty, of course, comes as no surprise. He, like Clinton, has lied under oath. As the saying goes, perjurers of a feather stick together.

In fairer times, when America was a country of equality before the law, both Comey and Clapper would be fired – or perhaps prosecuted – for dereliction of duty in regard to their refusal to prevent Clinton from doing further harm to U.S. national security. Instead, they have been allowed to empower her to do all the harm she wants to do. But with the ransom-to-Iran-paying Obama as president, and Loretta “Let’s make a deal, Bill” Lynch as attorney general, all the lawless are protected and praised, and only peasants like you and I are liable to be tormented by the application of the law by the lawless.

A final thought. If Director Comey really wants Americans to understand the need for additional reductions in the scope of the 4th Amendment’s protections, and to believe that such limitations would not be used to further advance the Obama-Clinton tyranny, let him demonstrate that he and his government colleagues will use that new power for legal purposes and not authoritarian ones. Comey’s FBI could, for example, acquire and make public the 33,000 e-mails that Clinton deleted and NSA now holds as a the first step toward, at long last, making Clinton and her aides and abettors the equal – not the superior — of the rest of America before the law.

These days, however, such a commonsense proposal is, as Sam Spade described the Maltese Falcon, the unobtainable stuff that dreams are made of. But Clinton, Obama, Lynch, Comey, and Clapper are unlike the Maltese Falcon in at least one important respect, which is that the Falcon was a fake, while those five are the genuine article. When the Fat Man used a knife to scrape the Falcon, he quickly found that it was not made of gold. Scrape the five just named individuals, however, and you would find they are precisely what they appear to be. Even a light scrape would begin to expose that those five are born felons, already clad in orange prison uniforms. (1)

 

–Endnote:

–1.) For young readers, the magnificent Humphrey Bogart played Sam Spade, while the great Sydney Greenstreet played the “Fat Man” in pre-degenerate Hollywood’s finest detective movie, The Maltese Falcon. The movie is relevant to the foregoing as a reminder of the importance of  always doing the right thing, most especially when it is a hard to do. Sam Spade — unlike James Comey — did the right thing in the movie. He made sure that the woman (played by the lovely Mary Astor) who had killed his partner, Miles Archer, “took the fall” and went to prison for her crimes. That woman happened to be the love of Spade’s life.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
Posted in Articles | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment